I do not recall the first time I became aware of Rep Tancredo and his fight against illegal immigration. For years I had been aware of the issue so hearing someone say something about it in general was not startling in and of itself. As time went on though I heard and read more about Rep Tancredo and his calling attention to this issue. The more I was exposed to his commentary the more I appreciated why he was so passionate and determined to speak out and make a difference.
To fight the scourge of illegal immigration he has given of himself like no one I know of in the political arena. He has not only done this for his family but yours as well and that is not lost on me. It is also not lost on me that he needs our support at this time.
I consider the money I have donated to the Tancredo campaign the best I have ever spent and the words I have spoken in his favor to be amongst my most heartfelt.
It is my view that Rep Tancredo has already had a tremendous impact on this election, far more than anyone in the MSM thought he would. Despite this success the issue of illegal immgration has not been resolved and the nation and its sovereignty is not safe and secure.
Rep Tancredo has done all he can do now we need to...
SovereignMan
Comments
You speak for us all, SM. Beauitiful words. I first became aware of Tom Tancredo just over two years ago when he visited Oklahoma with Bay Buchanan on a TAKE BACK AMERICA tour. (May not be the exact words) He said then "If this congress does not do something about the illegal immigration problem we have, I will run for President in '08." I made a silent vow then "And I will support you".
I began watching him then, I watched his efforts succeed in the House of Representatives only to die in the Senate. I watched Crime increase in our country, I watched wages being depressed, I listened to friends complain about how their neighborhoods were being trashed, I saw people in the stores when I shopped 4-5 adults hanging onto one shopping cart and talking in a foreign language. I read of disease outbreaks when they were supposed to be eradicated in this country, and read more and more food recalls. So many other ills. Then I watched marches and protests in our streets by people demanding rights they had not earned while we had Patriots dying in foreign places protecting OUR rights.
More recently, I have begun to read about a planned North American Union, a common government and a common monetary system and I am very, very worried.
I see Tom Tancredo as the only salvation for our blessed free and independent Republic.
Bobbie, you are correct about the North American Union. Tom Tancredo is the only candidate that has come out publicly (at the Lincoln Dinner in Iowa over the summer) and said, "If elected President, I will kill this idea of a North American Union in it's infancy."
I have been researching this thing heavily. This is one of the major reasons why I support Tom Tancredo. Not only that, but he is very strong against abortion and is probably the most bold candidate against the Islamic terrorists.
The people in my community are dismissing the threat of a North American Union and that is alarming to me. I talked with a lady yesterday who said she read a book about it "several years ago" and just did not believe it will happen. Her concern is beating Hillary but she has not decided which of the TOP TIER can do it. She does not like Giuliani and McCain but is unsure of Thompson and Romney. I told her of others I have talked to who view those two as lesser of evils and will not vote if any of the top tier is nominated, and sent her links to
THIRST FOR JUSTICE:
http://www.prolognet.qc.ca/clyde/cft.html
and
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and The New World Order
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Council_Foreign_Relations.htm
As you know I share your same concern about Sovereignty issues. With regards to those who are more concerned about beating Ms. Rodham than the true security of the nation I just do not let up on the angle that they cannot win without those that share my views and we are going done a different path. I refuse to vote for those who are not clear in their record and current standing on the position of being against a North American Union, Law of the Sea Treaty etc.
Basically my challenge to status quo Republicans and Reagan Democrats is to decide whether or not they want Representatives Tancredo, Hunter or Paul to win or Ms. Rodham.
I believe there is a solid 10% of voters who will vote for serious change one way or the other this coming election. The majority of those votes will come out of the Republican Party's hide because the Democrats are incorporating some significant change in their approach (even if you don't like it) while the Republicans are determined to retain the status quo which is anti-base. There is no way a top tier Republican candidate can win if just 10% of the party votes 3rd Party/Ticket. The math of reality is FL, OH, IA, NV, NM, AZ, MO, NH would likely be lost and I would not expect to win MN, WS, PA, MI, NJ, OR to offset that.
What is the difference between Guilianni & Rodham on the North American Union......
SovereignMan
answer: Guilianni's lawfirm has served as active counsel to promote it via the NAFTA Superhighway/TransTexas Corridor.